Tony Dean Outdoors - South Dakota Fishing and Hunting Information

What Tony Had To Say

A sampling of articles, opinion pieces, and tales from the field by Tony Dean.  (Note: Keep checking back, as articles will continue to be added).

HallOfFameSpeech


High Fence Hunts a Blight on our Sport
What Tony Had to Say >>

By Tony Dean


Hunting remains under fire in a nation where the vast majority of citizens live in densely populated areas, but some of the things taking place in hunting now only serve to shorten the time before its demise.

I write today of "high fence hunts," while strongly suggesting that "hunt" is not a term that should apply to the practice of hunting penned whitetail deer or elk within small confined areas. Can you imagine Teddy Roosevelt doing this?

High fence hunts are a blight on our sport because a true hunt includes the concept of fair chase, and in this effort, there's no chase. Thus far, 19 states have banned "high fence" hunting and Minnesota is now considering it. So should we. In fact, the North Dakota Wildlife Federation is looking at this issue.

I will confess to once having participated in a "high fence hunt," though nothing on the order of those in question. Years ago, I bow hunted elk in South Dakota's Custer State Park, an area that spans 250,000 acres enclosed by a high fence. That's an area about a third the size of Lake Sakakawea at full pool, or slightly larger than the present size of Devils Lake. Two decades ago, my wife took an antelope there that would have ranked in the top ten in history, but couldn't qualify under Boone & Crockett's stiff trophy rules.

There's more at stake in this issue than merely the continuation of sport hunting in America. Consider the spectre of Chronic Wasting Disease, (CWD), an epidemic that has, in most cases, been traced directly to fenced in herds of animals. Many wildlife managers maintain that further spread of CWD could jeopardize the future of American big game hunting.

I have written and talked about this issue in the past, and each time, I receive a bevy of e-mails and letters from owners of such places. Apparently, they believe the public shouldn't know what goes on behind that fence.

I believe part of the problem with this issue lies in the fact that in nearly every state, regulation of penned herds of deer and elk is given to the state Department of Agriculture. Ag groups have lobbied long and hard to call this "alternative agriculture."

Yet, the state game and fish agency is charged with the responsibility of maintaining herds of free-roaming animals, thus, this should be under their bailiwick.

But that's politics, and having spent nearly my entire life in rural America, I'll admit that agriculture has a bigger share of the ears of elected officials than do sportsmen.

The main point is, hunting penned animals behind high fences isn't hunting, and each time a sportsman enters such a place, he feeds the image many non-hunters have of us; that we don't care how we do it as long as we have a dead animal with large antlers at the end of the day.

Several years ago, I was one of the speakers at the Governor's Conference on America's hunting heritage at Green Bay, Wis. This annual event that rotates among various states, brings together all players. Two major ones were present. Ted Nugent and Heidi Prescott of the anti-hunting Fund for Animals organization. She criticized hunters for looking the other way on the subject of canned hunts. For once, Nugent had little to offer in way of rebuttal other than his flip, "You know me, Heidi, I just kill it and grill it." Most of the more than 1,000 in attendance conceded that round to Ms. Prescott.

I suspect that's because you can't defend high fence hunting. I doubt Aldo Leopold would have considered this a "split rail value."

Some wildlife management efforts have also led us astray, sadly in the name of conservation. The spring Snow goose season, known officially as the Conservation order, does that. It allows hunters to remove plugs from their shotguns, which almost any knowledgeable waterfowler will concede leads to increased crippling of birds. How about the long-banned electronics that will surely be used to control resident Canada goose numbers in the future? Or liberal or no limits which beg the question, what will a hunter do with dozens, even hundreds of dead geese?

A few years ago, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation had the courage to call for an end to hunting penned animals. I've been told that under the current leadership, wherein the new CEO came from the Safari Club, the policy has changed. If so, that's shameful.

I believe it is time for real hunters to step forward and call a halt to "canned hunts," and end this game farm nonsense that is being conducted under the guise of helping farmers survive in difficult times.

- Back to "What Tony Had to Say" Index! -


Tony Dean Outdoors - South Dakota Fishing and Hunting Information

• Back To Top Of Page •

• Site Navigation Map •

Contact - Tony Dean Outdoors - South Dakota Fishing and Hunting Information

Powered by Outdoor Network - Website Hosting, Design & Marketing

Outdoor Network - Website Design, Hosting & Marketing